Abstract:

This paper explores the implementation of psychological manipulation techniques in product design, particularly in gaming, focusing on their effects on player behaviour and engagement. The discussed techniques include Skinner Box Mechanics, Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), Social Pressure, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Artificial Scarcity, Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA), Pay to Win, Teasing Future Content, Locus of Control, Grinding, Loot Boxes, Gacha Systems, and the Zeigarnik Effect. Real-world examples, such as the game “Genshin Impact”, are used to illustrate the techniques’ applications. While acknowledging these methods’ effectiveness in increasing player engagement and revenue, the paper raises concerns about their potential to foster addiction, promote excessive spending, and create unfair gaming environments. The study calls for ethical game design practices and highlights the designers and developers’ responsibility in maintaining a balanced and fair gaming experience.

Introduction

Psychological manipulation techniques have been employed in various aspects of human life, from interpersonal relationships to marketing and advertising. Understanding these techniques can shed light on how consumer behavior is shaped, how decisions are influenced, and how interactions are guided. In product design, these methods play a critical role, often subtly, in guiding user experience, driving engagement, and encouraging specific user actions. The gaming industry, in particular, has become adept at employing these techniques to create compelling and immersive experiences.

However, the application of psychological manipulation techniques in product design is not without controversy. Moral and ethical concerns often arise, particularly when these tactics are used in ways that can lead to addictive behaviors or unnecessary expenditure. The impact of these techniques on the mental health and wellbeing of users is a subject of ongoing discussion in both academia and the industry.

To comprehend the dynamics of these manipulation techniques, this paper delves into fourteen of them, as applied in game design, with a focus on their influence on player behavior and engagement. Importantly, each technique will be viewed from both a product design and psychological standpoint to ensure a comprehensive understanding of its implementation and implications.

The Techniques

1. Skinner Box Mechanics

In the world of behavioral psychology, the Skinner Box, developed by B.F. Skinner, plays a pivotal role. This mechanism revolves around the concept of operant conditioning, where subjects learn to associate particular behaviors, such as pressing a lever, with receiving rewards. Game designers have translated this concept into their work by prompting players to perform simple tasks, followed by randomized rewards, thereby creating a compulsive loop of behavior.

This is evident in various mobile and free-to-play games, where completion of tasks results in rewards such as virtual currency, points, or character enhancements. However, the randomness of the reward sequence can lead to a compulsive cycle where players continue to perform tasks in anticipation of a potentially more substantial reward next time — an aspect that can become addictive.

2. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)

The phenomenon of FOMO plays a critical role in player engagement strategies in games. Time-limited events or offers with exclusive content available only for a short duration can induce a sense of urgency and scarcity. This pressure can propel players to participate or make purchases for fear of missing out on the exclusive content.

For instance, games often introduce special holiday events or weekend sales offering exclusive items or characters. By time-limiting these events, they can stimulate a sense of scarcity and urgency, urging players to spend more time in the game or make additional purchases.

3. Social Pressure

Social dynamics are influential factors in the gaming experience, particularly within multiplayer environments. Social pressure can push players to spend on cosmetic items to maintain status within a group or use social connections to encourage continuous engagement with the game. For example, games often offer bonuses for inviting friends to join or rewarding cooperative play to capitalize on the innate human desire for social connection.

However, the potential downside of this manipulation technique lies in the pressure it may create among players to conform to group norms or expectations, potentially leading to unnecessary spending or extended playtime.

4. Sunk Cost Fallacy

The sunk cost fallacy has a profound impact on player behavior. As players invest more time, effort, and money into a game, they are more likely to continue playing to justify their initial investment. This can be the case even if the player’s enjoyment of the game decreases over time.

This phenomenon can be problematic, particularly when it encourages players to spend more money or time on a game they no longer find fulfilling, leading to potential addiction or excessive spending.

5. Artificial Scarcity

Game designers often use artificial scarcity to increase the perceived value of in-game items or characters. By limiting the availability of certain items, an illusion of scarcity is created, leading players to spend more resources to acquire them. This can have a significant impact on player behavior, driving players to play longer hours or make additional purchases to secure these scarce resources.

While this strategy can enhance player engagement and revenue, it also raises ethical concerns about encouraging excessive spending.

6. Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA)

Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment is a technique that tailors the game’s difficulty level based on the player’s skill. Transparent application of DDA can enhance player engagement by providing a suitable level of challenge. However, when used non-transparently, it can be seen as manipulative, as it can be used to encourage additional spending.

For instance, making a game temporarily more challenging might push players towards purchasing power-ups or additional resources. This manipulation can create an unbalanced gaming experience, leading to questions about its fairness and ethics.

7. Pay to Win

The ‘Pay to Win’ model is prevalent in many games, allowing players to purchase items or upgrades that provide a significant advantage in gameplay. While this can help generate revenue for the game, it creates an uneven playing field favoring those who spend more money.

This model raises serious ethical concerns about creating an unfair gaming environment and promoting excessive spending.

8. Teasing Future Content

Teasing future content can be an effective strategy for keeping players engaged and looking forward to new additions. By giving sneak peeks of upcoming features or content, games can retain player interest, even if they may be losing interest in the current content.

However, it’s important to consider the potential disappointment and loss of trust that could occur if teased content does not live up to player expectations.

9. Locus of Control

A player’s sense of control over the game’s environment, narrative, or outcomes can significantly enhance their engagement and immersion. By fostering a sense of agency, game designers can captivate players, keeping them invested in the game world.

However, providing an illusion of control, where the actual impact of player decisions is minimal, can lead to player frustration and dissatisfaction.

10. Grinding

Grinding, or repeating tasks for incremental gain, is common in many games, particularly in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs). The player’s progress is often determined by their character’s level, skills, and equipment, which are typically improved through grinding.

While grinding can provide a sense of progress and achievement, it can also lead to fatigue or boredom if not carefully balanced with other gameplay elements.

11. Loot Boxes

Loot boxes, containing a random assortment of in-game items, have become a popular mechanism in game design. They can provide excitement and unpredictability, enhancing the gameplay experience.

However, loot boxes have come under criticism due to their similarity to gambling, raising concerns about fostering addictive behaviors and encouraging excessive spending.

12. Mechanisms of Gacha

The Gacha system, named after Japanese toy vending machines, has become a pervasive strategy within the gaming industry. It operates on a ‘loot box’ principle, where players pay for the chance to obtain a randomized item of varying rarity. This mechanic is psychologically intriguing, as it taps into the human predilection for chance-based rewards, thereby playing a crucial role in player retention and revenue generation. The intermittent and unpredictable nature of rewards in Gacha systems makes them akin to Skinner’s variable-ratio schedule, which is known to produce high rates of response, even in the absence of rewards.

This forms the psychological bedrock of Gacha systems’ addictiveness. The thrill of obtaining a rare, powerful character is essentially gambling, which is inherently addictive. Similarly, in “Genshin Impact,” players can acquire weapons or characters using Primo gems (the game’s currency), resulting in variable outcomes.

13. Zeigarnik Effect

The Zeigarnik effect, originally studied by Russian psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik in the 1920s, postulates that people tend to remember unfinished tasks better than they recall completed ones. The present study explores the Zeigarnik effect from two key perspectives: psychological and product design. Through the detailed analysis of real-world examples and case studies, this paper aims to provide insights into how product designers can harness the Zeigarnik effect to create more compelling, engaging, and user-friendly products.

In the realm of product design, the Zeigarnik effect can be employed to increase user engagement and retention. One of the primary ways is by creating a sense of incompletion that motivates users to return to a product or service.

The gaming industry is a prime example where the Zeigarnik effect is utilized. Games like Candy Crush keep players engaged by offering multiple levels that create a sense of unfinished business. The constant reminder of the pending level increases the likelihood of the user returning to complete the game.

14. Genshin Impact

In the pantheon of modern digital entertainment, ‘Genshin Impact’ has established itself as a monumental exemplar of the gamic medium’s potential. Developed by the Chinese company miHoYo, the game has found global resonance since its release in 2020. The focus of this article is to scientifically dissect the integral components of ‘Genshin Impact’, emphasizing its gameplay, narrative, technological elements, and its influence on socio-economic aspects.

From a ludo logical perspective, ‘Genshin Impact’ showcases an amalgamation of game mechanics and systems, providing an extensive interaction spectrum for its players. As an action role-playing game (RPG), it encapsulates various interaction modalities including combat, exploration, puzzle-solving, and character development. The game’s combat system relies on a character-switching mechanism that promotes strategic combination of different character abilities, while its progression system encourages continual exploration of the game’s vast world.

The incorporation of ‘gacha’ mechanics, where players can obtain random virtual items or characters, illustrates the application of probability theory and the role of randomness in player motivation. It taps into the psychological principle of intermittent reinforcement, incentivizing continuous engagement through the thrill of uncertain rewards.

Conclusion

While the psychological manipulation techniques employed in game design can effectively enhance player engagement and generate revenue, they also pose potential risks. Fostering addictive behaviours, encouraging excessive spending, and creating unfair environments are significant concerns.

Understanding these techniques, their implementation, and their implications can inform ethical game design practices. It can also stimulate critical conversations about the role of psychological manipulation in product design and the responsibilities that designers and developers bear in ensuring a balanced and fair gaming experience. It’s essential that the gaming industry continually assesses these techniques’ ethical implications to provide enjoyable, immersive, and ethical gaming experiences.

References:

1. Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology — Persuasive ’09. doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999..

2. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

3. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.

4. Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

5. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The Psychology of Sunk Cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140.

6. Zagal, J. P., & Deterding, S. (2018). Modes of Play: A Frame Analytic Account of Video Game Play. Games and Culture, 13(8), 854–877.

7. Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI.

8. Consalvo, M. (2009). Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

9. Walz, S. P. (2010). Toward a Ludic Architecture: The Space of Play and Games. ETC Press.

10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

11. King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2011). The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(2), 193–213.

12. Hamari, J., Alha, K., Järvelä, S., Kivikangas, J. M., Koivisto, J., & Paavilainen, J. (2017). Why do players buy in-game content? An empirical study on concrete purchase motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 538–546.

13. Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1–85.

14. Hu, J., Gao, H., & Wang, Q. (2017). Examining digital cheating in video games from a moral perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(4), 243–255.

15. Griffiths, M. D., & Nuyens, F. (2017). An overview of structural characteristics in problematic video game playing. Current Addiction Reports, 4(3), 272–283.

16. Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., von Gontard, A., & Popow, C. (2018). Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 60(7), 645–659.

17. Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2019). Arising of the ethical issues in the digital era of game industry. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 15(1), 1–18.